First, scientific proof is always required. The emphasis on philosophy and clear signs. Referring to the outer edge of science, science and against the various phenomena of uncertainty always find a clue to understand the phenomenon, which we follow the thread. Thus, science, and laid to the root form of a limited phenomenon exists, repeat the mistake of thinking science. However, just because science, general science and is something different. It is the geometry and psychology. Geometry, starting with Euclid, Euclidean geometry, was accompanied by clear signs of. So-called study is to rely on intuition. It is likely to be non-Euclidean geometry. By Lehman, hit this area was built, the first proof was needed, along with advances in technology, and clear proofs for the unusual. The earth seen from outer space, where two lines intersect, as is the Antarctic or the Arctic, found out, is very recently. Geometry and must always be clear signs of assuming. Because, the founder of Euclidean geometry do it unconsciously, because of clear proof to assume or consciously. Plato's "nation" is also coming out mathematically speaking now, and geometry. This is the simple geometric description. Then I move on to talk about psychology. Psychology and is exactly as stated by Michel Foucault, first, a study must be to ask whether a science. In the U.S., which is the principal empirical psychology, it is really strange. And to demonstrate the inner man, the thing impossible. Knowing it to Americans, the shoes have got in psychology. It is also the mysterious event which consent impossible. And, Wissenschaft Philosophy and differences, if you focus on it, of course, an absurd cause. Buddhism is today, but retribution theory, the penetration of natural science and Buddhist thought, which is also in danger of collapse, also is a fact. However, religion and philosophy, since Kant, what has become isolated. However, from the perspective of metaphysics, the significance of religion, philosophers always doing the criticizing. But science is completely divorced from religion and share, your own way now, and walk. This, along with the demise of the medieval Inquisition, and then suddenly, it was begun, there is no room for rebuttal.

 Science is, strictly, require proof. Philosophy is based on an intuition. There, there is a big difference.

 Our feeling for the experience, do not change much science is undergoing a rapid advance. This law aims to order the various concepts of science, seems like you are away with the resistance response to the principle that a mystical experience while invisible. We are still bound by the principle of subordination to the invisible of experience. Agree that come from this experience comes to science etc., but not. Science is to observe the phenomenon originally extracted from it a hypothesis, the chain of reasoning holds. The bottom line is that the evidence is governed by causal law is a science. Then we got the first experience with a recognition of something significant, would have carried a life? Both try to claim some experience in a variety of individuals we do it 勝Chi得Nai even in the vortex of the significance of the group. In fact, that even living here I do not doubt that. But in what is called a genius who has suddenly reveals his experience, shining among the population. We derive an empirical difference between genius and inevitably from this mass. However, these differences have experience now, we are hard to understand. Further differences in the experience and is attributed to individual differences are not. The experience and representation in what is their genius, would have given anything to them. This frequent "genius" word, we consider in detail later.
As the key to solving this, I cited for letting me past the wise words of Plato, where the idea that it deserves it. This is the root of many of the things to come out of a phenomenon bound by time and space constraints. While many may be misled by this but are not find out. It is intended to apply to the will of nature is not restricted in time and space, it is the source of all phenomena. Past, present and future called, it is time to get out of there. This idea led to what is absolutely universal. But the idea we have become nothing more than many of them. We now know that is not allowed to grab a single universal idea. A glimpse of the genius that is both universal and not an absolute idea (which is called Plato's ideas probably would not.) Is one universal truth, which facilitates the interpretation of the things that they I can see. Absolute truth or even a lasting genius why Say that the bias in the way of the route in some places and say that as one reason. But this bias is described in detail in this paper, it is not confused by people who are not even one person. Send also say that because of this the other day. This idea of truth and time, a phenomenon in the space, but once you grab it if it is over time, as always, they know what is to be repeated. Unclear, but many of you can distinguish between the expression of ideas in a strange way with words, and those ideas are not bound by self-interest, and many also say the ego is bound by. Impression seen transient self-interest by the public so that these may belong to many. Symptoms of many, where this truth with the aspect of the phenomenon and idea as if everyone show different aspects that are different from us. The barrel is a real philosopher should have received a sufficient insight into the ideas described so far. This ends the explanation for this remains an irreverent but also for readers, so for me, I'd excuse to devote a little space in this regard. And say that how we live daily Well, we basically saw the event said first perception. The idea is that subsequent events through reason. reading this article, an important reason accounting for the seat, I want to explain that bringing out cases where one dialectical perspective to facilitate the concept. Reason and the concept is to form a short speaking. It hit the root cause of the language, just different words derived from it. The result of that by skillfully combining the concepts of dialectics. It is used in a limited context of a conversation. The fence to learn this skill, even just talking to someone else to do. To wear it is a must pass through certain stages in sequence. The first step is necessary to interact naturally with others. After the conversation, and I could not explain his lack of discretion, we could not go out to the good opinion of other mistakes, "or what I should talk to the wind?" Ask yourself, and the deliberation and Repeat. Concept is the integration of thought and reason is the job of this. If you step on breathing naturally interact several times learn this stage, as well able to talk. However, because of a conversation lasting phenomenon, is generally regarded as an intuitive sense. So I used the word in a breath. These things are clear signs that humans are inseparable from the concepts and intuition. Be calculated easily by multiplying the balance of these two men does it idiot students head an industrial firm, will produce either. But because it is against dialectic thing thoroughly human, there is a false or fraudulent, it is time to get into and sometimes violence. Against their nature and do not lie, so of course, thinking carefully, the truth becomes visible by prudence. In these discussions is the end result is always the birth of a not so good. Frankly this kind of approach is often a chain of reasoning, the truth will arrive. But in real life and business would not hurt to keep it very useful to learn. Well it is just that.

 So-called difference between science and philosophy, has been mentioned as a fundamental problem. I said that science, as long as the experience in line with the philosophy of language are the limits to which academics go back. The above is the difference between science and philosophy.

Jim Crow

　First, we need to look back into history. Hegel rightly, "Philosophy of History lecture", and as stated, we have to be past back our life that stood at a critical point in history. Problem of discrimination, unless it no longer has an inferiority complex rooted in human nature, hardly, which is not lost. A good example is Jim Crow. Seibu era in America, blacks Bare Knuckle (boxing, but the current prototype, Using salt their hands at that time was a gamble to bet on which will win thumping whites), and can not be treated as human beings, After the Jim Crow era in a firm Seibu disappear. Have completely missed something, but Bushido originally was the first time was against black immigrants from the British also fought the British, perhaps, would have spurred Jim Crow. This "autobiography Franklin" familiar.

　More distant past to the past, from ancient Greece, and there were black slaves. But we just can not get from books that the status quo. Such as Plato and Socrates, and never without belittling the black slaves, black slaves the right to speak publicly in Congress was getting big. Of course, to some extent, my husband served the black slaves freed from the wedge, and was able to win the right to freedom, has been explicitly stated in the literature of ancient Greece and ancient Rome early. Nothing for the Greeks and Romans, probably black slaves did not have a bad idea. So, wages have given firm is in the asylum.

, The only black people on the subject of humility emerges everyday landscape as seen from the sidelines, no matter what. It would have been something terrible. Bystanders and is a strictly a spectator, never bringing in their own world, or thought or be absorbed in thought is not allowed. Once you get to that, the book Rousseau, Kant had become a teacher ordered the usual walks of timelessness.

　Well, let it come to the point. First of all, I am here to use special terms in advance, you said. Right. I said this right to point to the inherent right. And this right is the law between nations and individuals has been established as a public law. The law or the validity period expires, if the person entitled to waive their legal rights, or that a waiver would be inherent. Even the abandonment of the legal rights of blacks here, but it is reasonable to assume that the inherent right to exist still black. Here, I, as one example, referring to Serve fictitious black writers. By that, this agenda is more depth, would likely draw attention from people. Copyright rights of authors, and this inherent right is an indication of his intention, in the name of the law is not set. Positive law and is something for the future, and its significance in the name of justice in criminal law, used as a means of deterrence for the future of his crime, which tends to suppress the people's crimes. This is a reality show motive against the people defining the means of action on crime . On the other hand, the inherent rights and is the author's intention, his thought, including the right to fame. The difference between this right and the former is that the law can not suppress in the name of the people. Thing from a legal obligation is to protect this right does not exist, where the ethics come solely from the recognition surface, it is placed on this subject to protect the rights of individuals or morality. But to expect such a public morality would be impossible. To define their intentions because they are not black, from his own self-interest is, there is something that can hardly be thought beyond the interest emanates from. Generic cases are of interest for their ancient sages thought in the mountain today. It is illegal to overrun the exclusive right of the Negro. What will we do what the deceased in favor of fraud? Because they helped the beasts devour the interests of others. The truth about this mass as it were exploring an idea of intrinsic historical significance. So the beast is always with the public.
Freedom thing in the world of the press often calls for does not exist. This is a serious mistake in the Constitution. Freedom of thought is certainly present. This phenomenon more than the physical world with this act, but it is self-effort needs to be won by struggle. They too get away from this arena, eyes turned away from the reality of a coward. Of course, this freedom has issued an opinion pertaining to everyone, to win means that the legitimacy of this conflict is necessary.

　Present to witness the tragic fact of such inherent rights, to strengthen the protection of the rights of blacks than blacks Nishi their legal rights, there would be a reasonable way of deciding the legal limit. However, such a law can say that a very high risk  rights to be transferred to any country that the rights of black writers after the death of the black writer. This example is a socialist country index (banned) I think you can see. Just now, but this adverse possession rights have been daily. As a reasonable proposal, including the Black This delegation made from those who are receiving unfair treatment, we established an international committee chairman that it is necessary to protect the rights inherent in the African Information There. However, this approach may not last long. Person claiming the rights of individuals, unless it no longer has to violate property rights of others. We eventually emerged during the turning point of genius, just looking at the justice shall have to be true. For the first time that we are not present prosperity of mankind, leading to the ruin of civilization knows it.
"When people get a glimpse of the sun." Yes, that's the hawk in the sky for the first time look for sky small animals.