Jim Crow

　First, we need to look back into history. Hegel rightly, "Philosophy of History lecture", and as stated, we have to be past back our life that stood at a critical point in history. Problem of discrimination, unless it no longer has an inferiority complex rooted in human nature, hardly, which is not lost. A good example is Jim Crow. Seibu era in America, blacks Bare Knuckle (boxing, but the current prototype, Using salt their hands at that time was a gamble to bet on which will win thumping whites), and can not be treated as human beings, After the Jim Crow era in a firm Seibu disappear. Have completely missed something, but Bushido originally was the first time was against black immigrants from the British also fought the British, perhaps, would have spurred Jim Crow. This "autobiography Franklin" familiar.

　More distant past to the past, from ancient Greece, and there were black slaves. But we just can not get from books that the status quo. Such as Plato and Socrates, and never without belittling the black slaves, black slaves the right to speak publicly in Congress was getting big. Of course, to some extent, my husband served the black slaves freed from the wedge, and was able to win the right to freedom, has been explicitly stated in the literature of ancient Greece and ancient Rome early. Nothing for the Greeks and Romans, probably black slaves did not have a bad idea. So, wages have given firm is in the asylum.

, The only black people on the subject of humility emerges everyday landscape as seen from the sidelines, no matter what. It would have been something terrible. Bystanders and is a strictly a spectator, never bringing in their own world, or thought or be absorbed in thought is not allowed. Once you get to that, the book Rousseau, Kant had become a teacher ordered the usual walks of timelessness.

　Well, let it come to the point. First of all, I am here to use special terms in advance, you said. Right. I said this right to point to the inherent right. And this right is the law between nations and individuals has been established as a public law. The law or the validity period expires, if the person entitled to waive their legal rights, or that a waiver would be inherent. Even the abandonment of the legal rights of blacks here, but it is reasonable to assume that the inherent right to exist still black. Here, I, as one example, referring to Serve fictitious black writers. By that, this agenda is more depth, would likely draw attention from people. Copyright rights of authors, and this inherent right is an indication of his intention, in the name of the law is not set. Positive law and is something for the future, and its significance in the name of justice in criminal law, used as a means of deterrence for the future of his crime, which tends to suppress the people's crimes. This is a reality show motive against the people defining the means of action on crime . On the other hand, the inherent rights and is the author's intention, his thought, including the right to fame. The difference between this right and the former is that the law can not suppress in the name of the people. Thing from a legal obligation is to protect this right does not exist, where the ethics come solely from the recognition surface, it is placed on this subject to protect the rights of individuals or morality. But to expect such a public morality would be impossible. To define their intentions because they are not black, from his own self-interest is, there is something that can hardly be thought beyond the interest emanates from. Generic cases are of interest for their ancient sages thought in the mountain today. It is illegal to overrun the exclusive right of the Negro. What will we do what the deceased in favor of fraud? Because they helped the beasts devour the interests of others. The truth about this mass as it were exploring an idea of intrinsic historical significance. So the beast is always with the public.
Freedom thing in the world of the press often calls for does not exist. This is a serious mistake in the Constitution. Freedom of thought is certainly present. This phenomenon more than the physical world with this act, but it is self-effort needs to be won by struggle. They too get away from this arena, eyes turned away from the reality of a coward. Of course, this freedom has issued an opinion pertaining to everyone, to win means that the legitimacy of this conflict is necessary.

　Present to witness the tragic fact of such inherent rights, to strengthen the protection of the rights of blacks than blacks Nishi their legal rights, there would be a reasonable way of deciding the legal limit. However, such a law can say that a very high risk  rights to be transferred to any country that the rights of black writers after the death of the black writer. This example is a socialist country index (banned) I think you can see. Just now, but this adverse possession rights have been daily. As a reasonable proposal, including the Black This delegation made from those who are receiving unfair treatment, we established an international committee chairman that it is necessary to protect the rights inherent in the African Information There. However, this approach may not last long. Person claiming the rights of individuals, unless it no longer has to violate property rights of others. We eventually emerged during the turning point of genius, just looking at the justice shall have to be true. For the first time that we are not present prosperity of mankind, leading to the ruin of civilization knows it.
"When people get a glimpse of the sun." Yes, that's the hawk in the sky for the first time look for sky small animals.